Jackie Brown-Obama Could Revisit Arming Syria Rebels as Assad Holds Firm

http://www.nytimes.com/pages/world/middleeast/index.html

Obama can't decide whether he's for or against bearing arms.
He wants to take away guns from his own country, who has the RIGHT to protect themselves as stated in the Constitution. However, let's give guns to some of the most chaotic places in the world who will not use them with good intentions.

Here in this article, Obama is considering giving guns to the opponents of the unwanted President Bashar al-Assad of Syria. Additionally, he's already given weapons to the citizens of Juarez, Mexico, one of the largest drug cartel cities in the world. With intentions of giving them "self-defense", but why is he not satisfied with his own country possessing the same rights as these undeveloped countries he's helping?

Further more, as history shows, the only time guns have been confiscated is when the nation was about to be controlled by a dictator and become a totalitarian country. Hitler took guns away from the Jews in the Holocaust, Mousellini did the same act in Italy. These are only some of the well-known dictators I'm using as examples for gun-control patterns, there are more minor rulers that could be compared actions with the considerations Obama is taken into removing guns from the U.S.

Poor Obama, too many people trying to be his puppeteer & tell him what's right & wrong & how much to do of what. One puppet can only move so quickly, & our government is not willing to preserve what they promised to protect & maintain in the Inauguration: the Constitution.